/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Apple's iPhone 6 Plus & iPad Air 2 lose out to Samsung & Surface in detailed color accuracy analysis

Following its detailed reports on displays used in the new iPad Air 2 and iPad mini 3, today DisplayMate published a scientific analysis of color accuracy for the six best mobile displays it's tested this year.

9to5Mac Jordan Kahn

Context & Ripple Effects

Display quality had been a visible tablet battleground since 2011, when Samsung was described as the only tablet maker giving the iPad 2’s display serious competition. Apple’s own lineup also showed uneven results in the earlier iPad mini display assessment, which placed it below the fourth-generation iPad.

DisplayMate’s six-device comparison makes color accuracy a sharper basis for judging flagship screens, rather than treating resolution or product position as a proxy for display quality.

First-order effects

  • Samsung and the Surface line gain an independent color-accuracy advantage in a comparison that includes Apple’s iPhone 6 Plus and iPad Air 2.
  • Apple faces a documented weakness in two flagship displays, narrowing its ability to present screen quality as an uncontested iPhone-and-iPad strength.

Second-order effects

  • Samsung can extend the display competition identified in the earlier iPad 2 comparison from tablet-panel quality broadly to a specific, measurable attribute: color accuracy.
  • DisplayMate’s methodology gives reviewers and buyers a repeatable comparison point, increasing pressure on Apple, Samsung, and Surface makers to compete on calibrated output rather than headline specifications alone.

Third-order effects

  • If independent color testing remains influential, mobile-display competition will increasingly reward panel tuning and calibration alongside resolution and size.
  • The pattern points to third-party measurement becoming a product-positioning gatekeeper: device makers will need benchmarkable display performance to defend premium hardware claims.

The trend: Mobile displays are becoming a competition in independently measured visual fidelity, not simply pixel counts and screen dimensions.