/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Microsoft Hits Back as Google Muscles In

Microsoft Corp. has publicly dismissed Web-based Google Apps as a competitor to its Office software suite.  But, behind the scenes, Microsoft is stepping up its efforts to halt Google Inc.'s encroachment on its business-software turf.

Wall Street Journal Shira Ovide

Context & Ripple Effects

Google had been targeting Microsoft’s business-software base since its 2007 business-applications launch, and its 2009 “Going Google” campaign made that challenge more explicit. Microsoft had already framed enterprise adoption of Google Apps as a point of contention in 2007.

Microsoft’s intensified response matters because Office is also being delivered as a cloud service, moving the contest from a conventional software-suite comparison toward control of everyday business workflows.

First-order effects

  • Microsoft must devote more product, sales, and positioning effort to defending Office accounts against Google Apps as Google presses into business software.
  • Google Apps becomes a more direct focal point for Microsoft’s enterprise-software strategy, rather than a competitor Microsoft can readily downplay.

Second-order effects

  • Enterprise buyers face a sharper choice between Microsoft’s cloud-delivered Office offering and Google Apps, raising the importance of migration and implementation in purchasing decisions.
  • Microsoft and Google are pushed to compete for ownership of the same collaboration and productivity workflows, not merely for individual application features.

Third-order effects

  • If cloud delivery becomes the primary route for office software, incumbent suite vendors’ installed-base advantages become more contestable as workflow data, administration, and deployment move into the service layer.
  • The business-software market is trending toward competition over the platform that organizes work, where implementation and switching costs can shape vendor power.

The trend: Business productivity software is shifting from packaged suites toward cloud services competing to own enterprise workflows.