/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

With 8.8% market share, Apple has 73% of cell phone profits

Among the major vendors, Samsung captured 26%, HTC took 1%, and the rest lost money  —  FORTUNE — Asymco's Horace Dediu on Thursday updated his quarterly review of mobile phone profits, and the news for everyone but Apple (AAPL) and Samsung is not good.

Fortune Philip Elmer-DeWitt

Context & Ripple Effects

Apple had already shown that handset profits could be detached from shipment share: in 2011, its 4% share of the mobile market produced more than half of industry profit. The latest quarterly breakdown sharpens that imbalance, with Apple taking 73% of profits on 8.8% market share.

Samsung is the only other major profitable vendor at 26%, while HTC takes 1% and the remaining major vendors collectively lose money. That leaves nearly the entire industry profit pool with two companies rather than the largest-volume sellers.

First-order effects

  • Apple and Samsung capture 99% of major-vendor cell-phone profits, while HTC and the other named vendor group operate with little or negative handset profitability.
  • Loss-making vendors face immediate pressure to change their handset businesses because their market presence is not producing sustainable returns.

Second-order effects

  • Apple and Samsung can compete from profitable handset operations, widening the strategic gap with vendors that must fund product, marketing, and distribution while losing money.
  • Competition shifts away from market-share rankings alone: a vendor’s ability to stay in the market increasingly depends on converting sales into profit.

Third-order effects

  • If this distribution persists, the handset market will be shaped by profit concentration around a small number of vendors, with scale becoming less meaningful without pricing power and margins.

The trend: Mobile handsets are becoming a market where a small share of sales can command most profits, separating volume leadership from economic power.