/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Why Facebook is the New Yahoo

Facebook's awkward attempts to copy Google+ smack of a quiet desperation.  —  Sure, Facebook looks massively successful.  With a mind-boggling 750 million users, the social site can do no wrong, right?  —  Wrong.  —  Look closer, and it looks like Facebook can do nothing right.

Datamation.com Mike Elgan

Context & Ripple Effects

Facebook had already faced recurring doubts about its staying power, including a 2008 assessment that it was foundering, while a July 2011 comparison argued that Google+ improved on Facebook. The new critique treats imitation—not audience size—as the meaningful competitive signal.

Facebook’s 750 million-user scale sits alongside product changes aimed at engagement and platform reach, including the Subscribe Button and the planned Project Spartan HTML5-app platform. That makes the question less about reach alone than whether Facebook can set the product agenda.

First-order effects

  • Google+ becomes the immediate design benchmark for Facebook: awkwardly copying its rival risks weakening Facebook’s claim to product leadership despite its larger audience.
  • Facebook’s Subscribe Button gives users more control over News Feed content, while Project Spartan would extend Facebook’s contest for attention into HTML5 apps.

Second-order effects

  • Google+ can compete by presenting product improvements as an alternative to Facebook’s scale, forcing Facebook to defend user experience rather than relying on network size alone.
  • Developers and publishers gain another reason to watch Facebook’s platform direction: changes to feeds and HTML5 app distribution affect how audiences are reached inside the network.

Third-order effects

  • If large social networks must continually copy each other’s features to retain engagement, differentiation shifts from accumulated users toward control of feeds, developer platforms, and distribution rules.
  • The pattern points to social networking becoming a broader platform contest, where a large audience is necessary but does not by itself establish durable product leadership.

The trend: Social networks are evolving from standalone destinations into competing distribution and application platforms, with feed control and developer ecosystems becoming central battlegrounds.