/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

AP Files 7 DMCA Takedowns Against Drudge Retort

I'm currently engaged in a legal disagreement with the Associated Press, which claims that Drudge Retort users linking to its stories are violating its copyright and committing “'hot news' misappropriation under New York state law.”

Workbench Rogers Cadenhead

Context & Ripple Effects

AP had been expanding its controlled online distribution: in 2007, 100 radio and television sites joined its Online Video Network, using an MSN player alongside AP video and nationally managed advertising. The takedown campaign exposes a different boundary in that strategy: distribution AP manages versus referral traffic assembled by an outside community.

The dispute drew same-day coverage from several technology and media commentators, indicating that the copyright and New York “hot news” claims were being treated as a test of how much text may accompany a news link.

First-order effects

  • Drudge Retort faces seven DMCA notices, putting the affected user posts and their accompanying AP excerpts at risk of removal.
  • AP is asserting that links and excerpts can trigger both copyright and “hot news” claims, raising the compliance stakes for the site’s users and operators.

Second-order effects

  • Other news-aggregation services have an immediate incentive to review excerpt length and moderation practices when linking to AP reporting, rather than treating linking as legally uniform.
  • AP’s controlled distribution partners gain a clearer contrast with unaffiliated aggregators: one operates under AP’s technology and advertising arrangements, while the other is being challenged through rights enforcement.

Third-order effects

  • If publishers press copyright and “hot news” theories against short excerpts, news aggregation may shift toward more restrictive linking and excerpt policies set by large wire services rather than by aggregators.
  • The dispute points to a structural contest over whether publishers can use takedown processes to govern the referral layer around their reporting, not just copying of full articles.

The trend: Publishers are testing whether copyright enforcement can extend control from the news content itself to the excerpts and links that distribute attention around it.