/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Data Portability: It's The New Walled Garden

The scuffle today between Facebook and Google has very little to do with user privacy and everything to do with user control.  A huge battle is underway between Google, MySpace and Facebook around control of user profiles and, therefore, users themselves.

TechCrunch Michael Arrington

Context & Ripple Effects

Facebook and Google had both joined the DataPortability.org effort in January, putting an interoperability banner alongside a competition for the user profile. By mid-May, Google was also sponsoring OpenSocial and demonstrating Friend Connect, while Facebook had opened chat access through Jabber.

The dispute matters because profile data is not merely a privacy asset: it determines whether a competing social service can recreate a user's relationships and reduce the cost of switching.

First-order effects

  • Facebook, Google and MySpace are forced to treat access to user profiles as a competitive boundary, not simply a technical interoperability question.
  • Google's OpenSocial sponsorship and Friend Connect demonstration become part of its effort to build social connections outside Facebook's controlled profile system.

Second-order effects

  • Developers building social features must navigate separate profile-access rules, making the large networks' participation decisions more consequential than a shared portability pledge.
  • MySpace faces the same retention pressure as Facebook: easier movement of profiles can lower switching costs, while restricted movement preserves each network's accumulated user graph.

Third-order effects

  • If profile portability is governed by bilateral access terms rather than common standards, social networks can preserve gatekeeper power even while publicly supporting interoperability.
  • The contest points toward social platforms competing on control of identity and relationship data, with open protocols serving as both integration tools and strategic leverage.

The trend: Social networking is moving toward a battle over whether user identity and relationship data function as portable records or platform-controlled assets.