/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

A look at the race to build quantum computers, as the tech becomes a geopolitical battleground with potential to transform cybersecurity, finance, and more

Companies are racing to create devices that could revolutionize finance, supercharge medical and climate research …

Bloomberg Mark Bergen

Context & Ripple Effects

The field has long been defined by competing technical approaches from IBM, Google, Microsoft and others, as outlined in a 2019 survey of quantum-computing approaches. By 2023, coverage had focused attention on the engineering barriers behind qubits and the prospect of a cryptography-breaking “Q-day.”

A June 2026 assessment found Big Tech, startups and governments targeting commercially useful systems by 2030 despite persistent skepticism after repeated false dawns. The geopolitical framing raises the stakes beyond research milestones: quantum capability is being weighed both for scientific and financial applications and for its security consequences.

First-order effects

  • Big Tech, startups and governments pursuing useful quantum systems face a dual mandate: advance hardware while preparing for the encryption risks associated with a successful machine.
  • Organizations in finance and research-intensive fields gain a stronger incentive to track quantum progress because the prospective value is tied to specialized computational workloads, not general-purpose replacement of classical computing.

Second-order effects

  • Cybersecurity buyers and providers face pressure to prioritize migration planning for cryptography that could be vulnerable at “Q-day,” a risk detailed in the guide to quantum algorithms and hacking.
  • Government backing becomes more consequential to the competitive landscape, concentrating advantage among teams that can sustain long development cycles and connect quantum research to strategic priorities.

Third-order effects

  • If commercially useful systems emerge on the timetable investors and governments are targeting, quantum computing will be organized less as a standalone lab race than as strategic infrastructure spanning hardware, classical compute integration and security policy.
  • The field’s economic dividing line will shift from demonstrations of qubits toward the cost and reliability of logical qubits, making the push for commercial utility by 2030 a more meaningful benchmark than isolated technical milestones.

The trend: Quantum computing is evolving from a speculative research contest into a strategic-compute race in which security exposure and state backing shape commercial value.

Discussion

  • @skdh Sabine Hossenfelder on x
    Excellent article about quantum computing, hype and promise here: https://www.bloomberg.com/...
  • @business @business on x
    The race to build a quantum computer: “You're excited because ‘Oh, my gosh, this is working.’ And you worry because ‘Oh, my gosh, this is working.’” https://www.bloomberg.com/...
  • Mark Bergen Mark Bergen on linkedin
    “You're excited because 'Oh, my gosh, this is working.  And you worry because ‘Oh, my gosh, this is working.’” …
  • Ten Eleven Ventures Ten Eleven Ventures on linkedin
    Quantum computing is moving from a long-term promise toward something increasingly tangible, and Bloomberg Businessweek's latest feature on portfolio company …
  • @perrymetzger Perry E. Metzger on x
    I don't think she's wrong. There are only two really useful applications for quantum computing that I can think of: breaking cryptosystems and simulating chemistry. The former loses all commercial value once you can do it, though it would of course be interesting to intelligence
  • @skdh Sabine Hossenfelder on x
    The failure of quantum computing is finally sinking in https://www.youtube.com/...
  • @hkanji Hussein Kanji on x
    “These are all toy models” https://www.bloomberg.com/...
  • @cnasdc @cnasdc on x
    How do we know who's winning the quantum computing race? “There isn't consensus on how to assess progress,” @Constanza_MVB tells @Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/...
  • @robin_linus Robin Linus on x
    Quantum doomerism might be doomed in less than 5 years!! 🤯 https://arxiv.org/...
  • @perrymetzger Perry E. Metzger on x
    @skdh I still have the following complaint about the QC hype people. It has been many, many years now since a QC running Shor's Algorithm factored 21, that is, 3x7. Breaking RSA requires factoring numbers on the order of 2^4096, but I will settle for a demo that a QC can factor 3…