/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

The Eye of the (BlackBerry) Storm

iSuppli took apart Research In Motion's BlackBerry Storm to determine the cost of its components.  Guess what?  The iPhone parts are cheaper  —  As the battle for the smartphone market heats up, comparisons abound between Research In Motion's BlackBerry Storm …

Business Week Arik Hesseldahl

Context & Ripple Effects

The Storm entered the market framed as a direct challenger to Apple and Google handsets, with one outlet calling it an iPhone-and-G1 challenger and Verizon pricing surfacing before launch. A November Storm teardown had already made the device’s hardware a subject of close scrutiny.

iSuppli’s component comparison shifts the contest from features and reviews to cost structure: the iPhone’s lower-priced parts give Apple a potentially stronger hardware-economic position at comparable retail pricing.

First-order effects

  • Research In Motion faces a less favorable component-cost comparison for the Storm, limiting the gross-margin cushion available on a handset designed to compete directly with the iPhone.
  • Apple’s iPhone gains evidence that its hardware can be built with cheaper parts than the Storm, strengthening its position in price and margin comparisons.

Second-order effects

  • Verizon and Research In Motion have less room to use Storm discounts or carrier subsidies without putting additional pressure on device economics.
  • Component suppliers to competing smartphones face greater scrutiny from handset makers seeking to match the iPhone’s bill of materials rather than only its feature set.

Third-order effects

  • Smartphone competition is becoming a contest of both software experience and bill-of-materials discipline, rewarding vendors that can pair touch-screen features with lower hardware costs.
  • As teardown comparisons become a regular benchmark, retail price ceases to be a sufficient measure of competitiveness; margin flexibility becomes a strategic differentiator.

The trend: The smartphone race is expanding from product imitation into cost-structure competition, with teardown economics shaping pricing power alongside features.