/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Sources: Meta internally projected that it could spend as much as $10B annually on Anthropic's AI models, even as Zuckerberg publicly criticized Anthropic

The social networking giant projected it could spend $10 billion annually on Anthropic's tools, illustrating the friend-foe relationships underlying the A.I. race.

New York Times

Discussion

  • @jeremiahdillon Jeremiah Dillon on x
    The highest compliment in tech: a rival feels the need to dunk on you in public while simultaneously cutting you a PO in private. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @andrewcurran_ Andrew Curran on x
    Some new Watermelon information this morning from the NYT: The pretraining run of Watermelon was paused for unknown reasons back in July, which is why the launch was delayed to October.
  • @plumberbutt97 @plumberbutt97 on x
    This lines up with what @frontier_foid stated. Sounded like there was a senior engineer at $META that was responsible but I'll let you dive deep into the replies to figure out who is “at fault”.
  • @taumuyi Tau-Mu Yi on bluesky
    Meta can have a $10B ARR on its AI investment by just using its own coding agents instead of Claude [embedded post]