/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Twitter.com traffic down?  Seesmic Web is +30%/month

There are many reports that the traffic from Twitter.com would be going down.  We see the opposite on the app side, at least for Seesmic.  Seesmic Web is growing very strong as you can see the number of Tweets posted growing.

Loic Le Meur Blog Loïc Le Meur

Context & Ripple Effects

Twitter’s audience expansion had already been documented earlier in 2009, including a surge in global visitors, while a same-day analysis cited Nielsen data showing a 27.8% fall in U.S. visits to Twitter.com from September to fall 2009. Seesmic’s reported 30% monthly Web growth and rising tweet volume sharpen the distinction between traffic to Twitter’s site and activity on the service.

Seesmic had also broadened its client footprint, with a Windows desktop client launched four days earlier and Facebook Pages support added in September. Its figures make the client layer a more consequential lens for measuring where Twitter use occurs.

First-order effects

  • Seesmic gains evidence that its Web client is attracting more posting activity even as Twitter.com’s U.S. web audience declines by the cited Nielsen measure.
  • Twitter.com traffic becomes a less complete proxy for Twitter usage, because Seesmic reports growing tweet volume through an alternative interface.

Second-order effects

  • Other Twitter-client makers have an incentive to emphasize engagement and posting metrics rather than rely on Twitter.com visitor counts when presenting their growth.
  • Seesmic’s desktop and Web offerings can reinforce one another by giving users multiple access points to the same Twitter activity.

Third-order effects

  • If client growth persists while destination-site traffic softens, control over the user interface—not the underlying social service’s homepage—becomes a key competitive layer in social-media distribution.
  • Measurement of social-network growth shifts toward activity across third-party clients, complicating traffic-based assessments centered on a single domain.

The trend: Twitter usage is becoming increasingly distributed across third-party clients, separating service activity from visits to Twitter.com.