/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Want to Copy iTunes Music?  Go Ahead, Apple Says

SAN FRANCISCO — In moves that will help shape the online future of the music business, Apple said Tuesday that it would remove anticopying restrictions on all of the songs in its popular iTunes Store and allow record companies to set a range of prices for them.

New York Times Brad Stone

Context & Ripple Effects

Reports in November 2008 and January 2009 had already pointed to negotiations over DRM-free iTunes tracks and variable pricing. The move formalizes a break from the earlier arrangement in which Apple set the price of song downloads and arrives after talks with music labels over DRM-free music.

Removing copy protection makes iTunes purchases more portable, while variable prices give labels a direct role in how individual tracks are positioned in the store.

First-order effects

  • iTunes customers can copy purchased songs without Apple’s anticopying restrictions, reducing the lock-in created by protected files.
  • Record companies gain the ability to price songs within a range rather than sell every track at a single Apple-set price.

Second-order effects

  • Apple must operate iTunes with less control over post-purchase use of music, making the store’s catalog and buying experience more central to its appeal.
  • Labels can test whether premium pricing on selected songs yields more revenue than the uniform download price Apple had maintained.

Third-order effects

  • The change points toward a digital-music market in which access restrictions give way to pricing and catalog terms as the main levers of control between platforms and rights holders.

The trend: Online music distribution is shifting from platform-enforced copy protection toward licensing arrangements that trade greater consumer portability for more label pricing flexibility.