/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Adobe opensources Flex (Exclusive Videos with Adobe)

This morning I met with several members of the Adobe Flex team.  —  Official News on Adobe's Site about Flex going Open Source.  —  I have two videos of our conversation:  —  1. Video of our conversation this morning.

Scobleizer Robert Scoble

Context & Ripple Effects

Adobe entered 2007 expanding its platform reach with a public alpha of Apollo, a framework for cross-platform hybrid web/desktop applications. Adobe and Microsoft were already positioned as the principal RIA-platform rivals as developers began experimenting with their tools.

Making Flex source available turns a proprietary development framework into a more inspectable and adaptable part of Adobe's platform strategy, broadening the terms on which developers can evaluate it.

First-order effects

  • Flex developers gain access to the framework's source code, giving them more ability to inspect and adapt the tooling they use.
  • Adobe trades exclusive control of Flex's implementation for a wider route to developer adoption and outside participation.

Second-order effects

  • Microsoft's RIA tooling faces a competitor whose framework can be evaluated and modified more openly, increasing pressure to compete on developer experience and platform capabilities.
  • Teams choosing RIA tools can weigh source access alongside runtime and application-development features, making lock-in a more visible purchasing consideration.

Third-order effects

  • If developers reward open frameworks, RIA vendors' defensibility shifts away from closed tooling and toward the runtimes, ecosystems, and application services surrounding it.
  • Adobe's move points to platform competition in which source availability becomes a lever for ecosystem formation rather than merely a licensing choice.

The trend: RIA platforms are competing for developer allegiance by opening parts of their toolchains while concentrating differentiation in the broader platform ecosystem.