/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Inside the race for Bitcoin mining capacity, which increased by about 30,000 percent in 2013

Into the Bitcoin Mines  —  On the flat lava plain of Reykjanesbaer, Iceland, near the Arctic Circle, you can find the mines of Bitcoin.  —  To get there, you pass through a fortified gate and enter a featureless yellow building.

DealBook Nathaniel Popper

Context & Ripple Effects

The mining story has been building all year: back in April 2013, TechCrunch tallied $150,000 a day in power consumption alone across the network, and by November Businessweek was tracking several companies racing to build specialized mining chips. DealBook's visit to the Reykjanesbaer facility puts a physical face on that chip race — purpose-built halls behind a fortified gate on Icelandic lava, sited near the Arctic Circle for cheap cooling and power.

The timing matters: the piece lands a week after BTC China halted deposits and Bitcoin lost almost half its value overnight, following an earlier drop below $700 on BPI exchanges. The 30,000 percent capacity surge means miners are holding fast-depreciating hardware against a falling coin price, which is why the syndicated pickup was broad — Business Insider, VentureBeat, and investors including Chris Dixon, Chris Sacca, and Kevin Rose all amplified it within a day.

First-order effects

  • Miners who ordered ASICs at 2013 peak prices now hold equipment whose payoff window is shrinking twice over — difficulty rising with each new chip shipment while the coin trades down from its December highs.
  • Icelandic hosts like the Reykjanesbaer operation gain leverage as the scarce asset shifts from mining rigs themselves to access to cheap, cool power to run them.

Second-order effects

  • Specialized-chip makers are forced into ever-shorter product cycles, since each generation obsoletes the last and customers' payback math depends on shipping before the next wave lands.
  • Regions with abundant low-cost electricity — Iceland first among them — start courting mining operators the way they once courted heavy industry, turning power contracts into a competitive input for the currency's infrastructure.

Third-order effects

  • If the arms-race logic holds, Bitcoin mining consolidates from distributed hobbyists toward capital-intensive, datacenter-style operators clustered where power is cheapest — a structural concentration of what was designed to be a decentralized network.
  • The pattern establishes a template other compute industries will copy: treat electricity, not silicon, as the binding constraint on capacity siting.

The trend: Bitcoin mining is industrializing from garage rigs into power-hungry data centers sited for cheap electricity, with chip cycles and coin volatility setting the pace of consolidation.