/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

New York Asks Cellphone Carriers to Explain Why They Rejected Antitheft Switch

SAN FRANCISCO — New York State's top prosecutor is investigating why American cellphone carriers have yet to embrace antitheft software on Samsung smartphones, raising questions about possible coordination among the biggest carriers.

New York Times Brian X. Chen

Context & Ripple Effects

The investigation is the escalation of a year-long campaign: San Francisco and New York officials met with leading smartphone makers in June 2013 to curb a spike in phone thefts, and by summer Apple and Samsung devices were being put through an antitheft stress test. In November, the carriers' refusal to adopt the kill switch was documented directly.

The trend: State prosecutors are converting antitheft advocacy into formal investigations of carrier conduct, testing whether distribution gatekeepers can keep security features off consumer phones.