/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Apple wins another chance to ban Samsung phones for infringing its patents

In a ruling delivered today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has given Apple another chance at halting sales of Samsung smartphones that infringe on its patents.

The Verge Chris Welch

Context & Ripple Effects

This ruling is the latest turn in Apple's two-year campaign to convert its 2011 jury win over Samsung into an actual US sales ban. Apple first gave Samsung work-around options for its iPhone and iPad design patents in December 2011, then launched its renewed appeal for a ban in December 2012 after a district court declined to enjoin infringing devices.

The stakes were raised in August 2013, when Samsung faced a sales ban on older devices in the US, and today the Federal Circuit hands Apple another shot at extending that remedy to the broader Galaxy lineup. The story drew wide pickup — Reuters, VentureBeat, FOSS Patents and several Bay Area papers all ran it the same day — reflecting how closely the smartphone industry watches whether courts will actually pull infringing phones off shelves.

First-order effects

  • Samsung's infringing smartphone models face renewed exposure to an injunction, since the case returns to the lower court with Apple's ban request back in play.
  • Apple gains procedural momentum after two setbacks — the 2012 denial of an injunction and the narrow scope of the August 2013 ban on older devices.

Second-order effects

  • Samsung's incentive to implement the design work-arounds it was offered back in 2011 sharpens, since redesigning accused features is cheaper than losing Galaxy sales during an appeal cycle.
  • Rival Android vendors selling in the US must price in the possibility that patent verdicts translate into lost shelf time, not just damages paid years later.

Third-order effects

  • If the Federal Circuit keeps lowering the bar for injunctions in tech cases, patent holdings become a credible weapon for removing competitor products from the market rather than merely taxing them with royalties — reshaping how handset makers budget for litigation versus design-around engineering.

The trend: Smartphone competition is increasingly fought through multi-year appeals over injunctive relief, where winning a patent verdict matters less than convincing courts to actually halt sales.