/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Why I Changed My Mind On Klout (And Invested)

Klout has been one of my go to punchlines for some time now.  For example - in May I wrote a post titled “My Detailed Thoughts On Klout” that contained a single word in the post itself: “Why?”  —  The problem I had with Klout …

Uncrunched Michael Arrington

Context & Ripple Effects

Jason Calacanis built a running bit out of mocking Klout — his May post on the company was literally one word, 'Why?' — and the broader press had spent 2011-2012 doing the same, from the 'Klouchebag' takedown in April to commentary arguing nobody cared about Klout scores anymore. The company's answer was product, not argument: an iPhone app in May, a Cathay Pacific partnership putting high scorers in the SFO lounge, and an August 14 scoring update that factors real-world influence rather than just Twitter activity.

His reversal and investment matters because Klout's core problem was always credibility among exactly this crowd — the analysts who set the tech conversation. It echoes Scobleizer's earlier public mea culpa on Quora, another case of a prominent skeptic re-rating a much-mocked service.

First-order effects

  • Calacanis moves from public critic to shareholder, converting his mockery audience into a rebuttal platform and giving Klout both angel capital and a credibility signal with the skeptics who mattered most.
  • Klout's August 14 scoring update — weighting real-world influence alongside online metrics — gets its highest-profile validation yet, since the change is what flipped its most visible detractor.

Second-order effects

  • Perk partners like Cathay Pacific gain a proof point that influencer scores can drive premium-customer targeting, encouraging more brands to treat Klout data as a marketing channel rather than a gimmick.
  • Other angels and early-stage funds now face a live test of whether influence-scoring is an investable category, with a former punchline suddenly carrying a valuation and named backers.

Third-order effects

  • If critic-turned-investor reversals keep landing, influence scoring hardens into infrastructure — embedded in airline lounges, marketing budgets, and venture portfolios — even as the underlying debate about what the scores actually measure stays unresolved.

The trend: Social-influence scoring is shifting from industry punchline to funded platform, as scores get attached to real-world perks and win over the skeptics who once defined the backlash.