/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

24.9M Tablets Sold In Q2, With Apple's Share Of That Now Over 68%, Says Strategy Analytics

One of the strong points in Apple's quarterly earnings report yesterday was sales of the iPad.  Globally, they were up 52% by revenue and 84% by unit sales, respectively to $9 billion and 17 million.

TechCrunch Ingrid Lunden

Context & Ripple Effects

Strategy Analytics' Q2 tally lands the same week as Apple's own earnings, and the two sources agree: 17 million iPads sold, up 84% by units and 52% by revenue to $9 billion, putting Apple above 68% of a 24.9-million-unit global tablet market. The pickup was broad — BGR, CNET, Engadget, MacRumors, PC World and others all ran the same numbers within a day, which is unusual saturation for a quarterly tracker release.

The share figure also frames the fight Apple is already in: it heads into a California patent trial against Samsung seeking $2.5 billion in damages, having offered Samsung a half cent per device licensing rate on standard-essential patents, while Samsung is the largest remaining challenger in the tablet share table.

First-order effects

  • Apple's iPad business is now validated by an independent tracker as well as its own P&L, giving the company a defensible 'two-thirds of the market' claim in both investor and courtroom settings.
  • Every non-Apple tablet maker — Samsung foremost among them — is competing for less than a third of a market that grew 84% by units in a single quarter at Apple alone.

Second-order effects

  • Samsung enters the California trial with its tablet franchise trailing badly, which raises the stakes of the $2.5 billion damages claim and makes cross-licensing terms like Apple's half-cent-per-device offer a live pricing question for every Android OEM.
  • Component suppliers and contract manufacturers face a customer base where one buyer sets volume expectations, squeezing margins for anyone building tablets on spec for the Android side.

Third-order effects

  • If the share pattern holds, the tablet market structurally resembles the early-iPod era the description invokes — a single vertically integrated vendor defining the category while a fragmented licensees' field competes on price rather than platform.
  • A market this concentrated invites regulatory and standards-body scrutiny of how essential patents are priced, since the royalty dispute between the top two vendors effectively sets terms for the whole Android supply chain.

The trend: The tablet market is consolidating around a single vertically integrated vendor, with patent-royalty disputes between Apple and Samsung becoming the mechanism through which the rest of the industry's economics get set.