/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Adobe: Chrome for Android will not get Flash support

When Google today launched Chrome for Android in beta they did so without support for Adobe Flash.  For many users this seemed surprising given the strong push for Flash on Google's mobile OS after Steve Jobs and Apple refused to allow Adobe's platform on their iOS devices.

Android Phone Fans Kevin Krause

Context & Ripple Effects

Adobe's mobile Flash campaign has been unwinding for a year. After the CEO promised Flash across Android, WebOS and BlackBerry devices in 2H 2010, the Android player shipped weak (LAPTOP Mag called it proof of Jobs' argument) and the Samsung Galaxy Tab build was an outright failure. In November 2011 Adobe drew a line: Flash would reach Android 4.0 but not Android 5.0.

Today's beta launch of Chrome for Android makes that line explicit — Google's own next-generation browser ships without Flash, and Adobe confirms it will never be added. The irony is sharp given Google spent two years pushing Flash on Android precisely because Apple barred it from iOS.

First-order effects

  • Chrome for Android users on Flash-dependent sites must fall back to the stock Android browser, splitting the Android web into a Flash-capable old stack and a Flash-free new one.
  • Adobe loses its last flagship distribution vehicle on mobile: with Chrome excluded and Android 5.0 already ruled out in November 2011, its confirmed roadmap leaves Flash stranded on legacy Android versions only.

Second-order effects

  • Google signals to publishers and advertisers that the future Android web is HTML5-based, pressuring sites still serving Flash video and ads to accelerate rewrites or lose Chrome traffic as the browser scales beyond beta.
  • Apple's iOS position is effectively vindicated by Google's own engineering choice, removing the last competitive talking point Android carriers and OEMs used when marketing Flash against the iPhone and iPad.

Third-order effects

  • If Chrome becomes Android's default browser path, plugin-based rich media gives way to a single HTML5/JavaScript runtime controlled by the browser vendor — concentrating web-platform power in Google's hands rather than Adobe's.
  • The episode sets a template for how platform owners retire contested technologies: ship the successor without the legacy layer, let market share do the deprecation, and avoid a formal end-of-life fight.

The trend: Mobile platforms are consolidating around native HTML5 runtimes, with browser vendors — not plugin makers — deciding which web technologies survive on phones and tablets.