/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

How many iOS devices will be sold in 2012?

There are several methods I turn to when estimating device sales.  —  Top-Down Demand analysis  —  The first is to look at so-called top-down views of the demand.  This method takes a view of the overall phone market and assumes share for smart devices and …

asymco Horace Dediu

Context & Ripple Effects

Asymco has been building a public track record on iOS forecasting all year — its March 2011 piece on predicting iPhone sales with simple models was the last major entry before this one. What changes here is scope: instead of one product line, the method now covers the whole iOS family, which matters because the device mix is lopsided — back in September 2010 the iPod touch alone accounted for 37.7% of all iOS devices sold, so any whole-platform estimate lives or dies on how you treat non-phone devices.

The piece is also a methodology disclosure rather than just a number: by walking through top-down demand analysis — sizing the overall phone market and assuming smart-device share — the analyst hands readers the assumptions they need to audit the forecast, not just the output.

First-order effects

  • Anyone tracking Apple gets a checkable benchmark: the published 2012 estimate and its stated assumptions can be scored against actual quarterly shipments as the year unfolds.

Second-order effects

  • If whole-platform volume estimates gain credibility over single-product guesses, sell-side and independent analysts are pushed to publish full iOS-family models — including iPod touch and iPad assumptions — rather than iPhone-only numbers.

Third-order effects

The trend: Apple analysis is moving from reacting to quarterly unit surprises toward model-based forecasting of the cumulative iOS installed base, where device mix and per-device revenue matter more than any single quarter.