/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Internet Explorer 9 utterly dominates malware-blocking stats

Internet Explorer 9's dual-pronged approach to blocking access to malicious URLs—SmartScreen Filter to block bad URLs, and Application Reputation to detect untrustworthy executables—provides the best socially engineered malware blocking …

Ars Technica Peter Bright

Context & Ripple Effects

The security story of Internet Explorer has come full circle. Bruce Schneier's 2005 takedown of Internet Explorer's security record fixed the browser's reputation as the web's most dangerous default, and Microsoft has spent 2011 rebuilding it: the March review of Internet Explorer 9 framed it as the most modern browser Microsoft has shipped, January's RC added ActiveX filtering, and by May IE was the only browser untouched by a widespread memory-leak bug.

This new data completes that arc on the threat side: where IE once lost share over unpatched flaws, IE9 now leads on blocking attacks before they land, pairing SmartScreen Filter's malicious-URL checks with Application Reputation's screening of downloaded executables against socially engineered malware.

First-order effects

  • IE9 users get measurably stronger protection against socially engineered malware than users of any competing browser, because both the malicious-link path and the malicious-download path are screened by default.
  • Microsoft gains a defensible security talking point for Windows 7 upgrades at a moment when the rest of its 2011 coverage has been favorable on stability and features.

Second-order effects

  • Rival browser makers face pressure to match the two-layer model — URL reputation plus executable reputation — or concede the enterprise and family-PC segments where 'which browser blocks malware' is a purchasing argument.
  • Reputation data becomes a competitive asset in itself: whoever accumulates the largest corpus of rated URLs and binaries holds an advantage that late entrants cannot replicate quickly.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, browser security shifts from patching vulnerabilities after discovery to scoring links and downloads before execution, making the browser the de facto endpoint-defense layer and turning reputation infrastructure into a structural moat between incumbents and challengers.

The trend: Browser makers are repositioning from reactive vulnerability patching to proactive reputation-based malware blocking, with Microsoft's SmartScreen stack as the early benchmark.