/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Facebook and Google+'s video chat tools compared

Video chat is the big thing again, at least according to Facebook, which let loose a new video chat service yesterday.  Powered by Skype, the new feature lets Facebook users start a video calls with one another while continuing to use the site.

CNET News Josh Lowensohn

Context & Ripple Effects

The launch caps months of buildup: reports of Skype integrating with Facebook surfaced back in October 2010, a November 2010 story asked outright whether Facebook was preparing video chatting with Skype, and TechCrunch called the timing days ago with its report that an in-browser video chat would arrive that week. Zuckerberg confirmed the collaboration at the announcement, with the product built by the Skype team.

The timing puts this head-to-head with Google+: the CNET piece frames the comparison directly against Google+'s video chat tools, arriving weeks after Google+ debuted Hangouts as a marquee feature. Facebook also arrives at this from a defensive posture — the same week it blocked a Chrome extension exporting friends' data, after privacy stumbles it has had to address, per the article's framing.

First-order effects

  • Facebook users can now start one-on-one video calls inside the site without installing a separate client, removing the last step where a conversation leaves Facebook for Skype's own app.
  • Skype gains distribution to Facebook's entire user base without spending to acquire those users, while Google+ must answer for Hangouts being matched feature-for-feature by the far larger network.

Second-order effects

  • Standalone calling apps lose their moat when the social graph owner bundles the same capability for free, pressuring Skype's own client and any third-party chat tools to differentiate on group features — exactly where Hangouts currently leads.
  • Google is pushed to lean harder on Hangouts as Google+'s differentiator, since Facebook just neutralized the simple one-to-one video call as a selling point.

Third-order effects

  • Real-time communication is becoming a native layer of social platforms rather than a product category of its own, with the platform holding the friend graph able to absorb point solutions built by partners like Skype.
  • If platform-embedded chat keeps winning, communications vendors increasingly survive as infrastructure behind large networks instead of consumer destinations in their own right.

The trend: Social networks are absorbing real-time video calling as a bundled feature, turning one-to-one chat into table stakes and pushing differentiation toward group experiences like Hangouts.