/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Dealtalk: Google bid “pi” for Nortel patents and lost

(Reuters) - At the auction for Nortel Networks' wireless patents this week, Google's bids were mystifying, such as $1,902,160,540 and $2,614,972,128.  —  Math whizzes might recognize these numbers as Brun's constant and Meissel-Mertens constant …

Reuters Nadia Damouni

Context & Ripple Effects

Google entered the week as the presumptive buyer: it had put the stalking-horse $900 million bid on Nortel's wireless portfolio in April — a move Techdirt flagged for its risk of minting new patent trolls — and the DOJ cleared its bid on June 14. Bloomberg had reported in April that RIM was weighing a rival offer, so a contested auction was expected.

What was not expected was the bidding style: Reuters reports Google submitted bids built on mathematical constants such as Brun's constant ($1,902,160,540) and the Meissel-Mertens constant, and still lost. Syndicated pickup by the New York Times' DealBook — 'Apple and Microsoft Beat Google for Nortel Patents' — shows how widely the defeat travelled within days.

First-order effects

  • The Apple-Microsoft-led consortium takes Nortel's ~6,000 wireless patents, while Google — which wanted the portfolio as a defensive shield for Android — leaves the bankruptcy auction empty-handed despite clearing antitrust review weeks earlier.
  • RIM, reported in April to be considering a topping bid, ends up on the winning side rather than competing against Google.

Second-order effects

  • Android handset makers now face licensing exposure to patents held by Google's direct OS rivals, sharpening the per-device royalty fight around smartphones.
  • The loss pushes Google toward alternative sources of defensive IP — organic filing, partnerships, or acquisitions — rather than bankruptcy-auction purchases.

Third-order effects

  • Bankrupt companies' patent estates are becoming strategic weapons in the mobile platform wars: when a distressed seller holds standards-essential IP, OS vendors will pay billions rather than let a competitor control it.
  • If losing bidders respond by buying entire patent-holding firms instead of individual portfolios, expect antitrust regulators to shift scrutiny from auction conduct to who is accumulating platform-critical IP.

The trend: Smartphone competition is increasingly fought through acquisitions of bankrupt estates' patent portfolios rather than through products, with each blockbusting sale raising the price of the next.