/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

What's on the Table for Tablets This Year [Personal Technology]

Lots of consumers are planning to buy tablet computers this year, and lots of companies are hoping to sell them.  Apple managed to sell around 15 million of its ground-breaking iPads last year in only nine months, and …

All Things Digital Walter S. Mossberg

Context & Ripple Effects

This piece lands almost exactly one year after analysts projected the then-unreleased Apple tablet as a nearly $3 billion first-year business — a call that proved conservative once Apple confirmed roughly 15 million iPads sold in just nine months of 2010. The intervening year filled in the supply side too: back in March 2010 Arm counted over 50 iPad-like devices slated for release, and by August U.S. buyers were signaling they were hungry for slates beyond the iPad itself.

So the question at the start of 2011 is no longer whether a tablet market exists — Apple answered that — but whether any of the dozens of challengers can carve out share against an incumbent with a nine-month head start, a proven price point, and an ecosystem already in place.

First-order effects

  • Every tablet maker shipping in 2011 enters against a concrete benchmark rather than a hypothesis: Apple's ~15 million units in nine months defines both the scale of the prize and the bar for relevance.
  • Consumers who expressed interest in non-iPad slates in the August 2010 coverage finally get real alternatives this year, turning the category from a one-product market into an actual competitive field.

Second-order effects

  • Silicon and component vendors sit on the winning side either way: with 50-plus announced devices built on Arm-based designs, chipset demand scales with the whole category, not with any single vendor's fortunes.
  • Apple's pricing power becomes the forcing function — challengers must undercut or differentiate against a product whose cost structure is already amortized across 15 million units, squeezing margins for late entrants.

Third-order effects

  • If even a fraction of the announced devices sell at meaningful volume, tablets consolidate into a second mainstream computing platform alongside laptops, reshaping how PC makers, carriers, and software developers allocate R&D and shelf space.
  • The pattern — one vendor defining a category, then dozens racing in — sets up the industry for the familiar shakeout phase, where most of the 50-plus entrants exit and a handful of platform owners absorb the market.

The trend: Tablets are completing their move from single-vendor novelty to a contested mainstream computing category, with 2011 as the year the challenger wave meets the incumbent's installed base.