/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

HTML5: An antidote for Apple App Store-itis

Imitation not the sincerest form of flattery  —  Open...and Shut To the man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail.  Or in the case of our idea-starved tech industry, an app store.  —  The tech world is increasingly awash in app stores.

The Register Matt Asay

Context & Ripple Effects

Matt Asay's 'Open...and Shut' column drops into a fight that has been building all year: whether mobile software ships through native, store-distributed binaries or through the browser. Fred Wilson framed the Flash-versus-HTML5 question back in February 2010 in his post on Flash, HTML5, and mobile apps, and Google answered Apple's HTML5 showcase with its own HTML5Rocks tutorial site that June — both sides treating the markup language as strategic ground rather than plumbing.

The Register's angle is distribution economics, not rendering: every platform vendor is cloning Apple's store because the iPhone channel demonstrably works — Robert Scoble wrote in November 2010 about how iPhone apps were taking off through it [[a:1189064]] — and the column reads the copycat wave as idea-starvation that an open HTML5 web could route around.

First-order effects

  • Apple's cut of app distribution, and the review gate attached to it, comes under pressure from developers who can reach the same devices through standards-compliant browsers instead of store submissions.
  • Every vendor running a me-too app store competes with all the others for a finite pool of developers, pushing up the cost of attracting quality software on every platform.

Second-order effects

  • Google, already positioned by its HTML5Rocks counter-showcase, gains a ready-made identity as the open-web standard-bearer against Apple's closed distribution model — a competitive wedge that costs it nothing but standards advocacy.
  • Browser vendors inherit new leverage in the contest: whoever drives HTML5 feature implementation fastest becomes the de facto arbiter of what mobile software can do, a role the stores hold today.

Third-order effects

  • If HTML5 capability keeps narrowing the gap with native APIs, platform differentiation shifts from exclusive apps toward hardware and services, eroding the store tollbooth as a moat.
  • A web-centric distribution model restores something closer to pre-App Store economics — publishing without gatekeepers — setting up a durable industry-wide fight over who taxes mobile software.

The trend: Mobile software distribution is splitting into two camps — platform-owned app stores versus an open HTML5 web — and each major vendor is being forced to pick a side.