/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Military Bans Disks, Threatens Courts-Martial to Stop New Leaks

It's too late to stop WikiLeaks from publishing thousands more classified documents, nabbed from the Pentagon's secret network.  But the U.S. military is telling its troops to stop using CDs, DVDs, thumb drives and every …

Danger Room Noah Shachtman

Context & Ripple Effects

The ban is the latest step in a long retrenchment: troops were pushed off their own war blogs in 2006, MySpace and other social sites went off limits in 2007, and the Air Force blocked wide swaths of the blogosphere in 2008. Each round tightened what a soldier could reach from a military terminal; this one tightens what a soldier can carry out of one.

It also follows an August 2010 debate over whether a cyberattack against WikiLeaks could work at all — coverage that argued taking the site down would not retrieve the copies already loose. The Pentagon appears to have absorbed that lesson: rather than attacking the publisher, it is sealing the source, even though thousands more documents are already out of its hands. The story traveled fast the same week, picked up by Ars Technica, Boing Boing, The Atlantic's Net Effect and MediaMemo amid Anonymous's DDoS reprisals and Amazon's WikiLeaks hosting controversy.

First-order effects

  • Troops lose the routine ability to move files between classified and unclassified machines on CDs, DVDs and thumb drives — the everyday workaround for air-gapped networks — under threat of courts-martial for violations.
  • WikiLeaks loses nothing immediately: with thousands more cables already extracted from the Pentagon's secret network before the ban, publication continues regardless.

Second-order effects

  • Commands must now fund and deploy network-side alternatives to sneakernet — audited transfer gateways and centralized file movement — shifting procurement toward insider-threat and data-loss-prevention tooling.
  • Every branch faces the same choice the Air Force made in earlier rounds: restrict more of the network or accept the risk, making blanket access blocks the path of least resistance.

Third-order effects

  • If each leak wave buys another layer of restriction, the military drifts toward treating every service member as an untrusted endpoint — the endpoint-security logic of the corporate world applied to a conscript-scale workforce.
  • The episode hardens a doctrine in which controlling the physical medium, not the adversary's website, becomes the primary leak countermeasure — a posture other governments handling classified material can be expected to copy.

The trend: Military information control is escalating from blocking what troops can read online to locking down what they can physically remove, with WikiLeaks' cache as the forcing function.