/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Bram Cohen on the Future of BitTorrent

What's next for BitTorrent, a company that initially tried to establish a peer-to-peer-based download store for mainstream Hollywood, then aimed to help publishers distribute bits more effectively?  BitTorrent co-founder and chief scientist Bram Cohen explained today …

GigaOM Josie Garthwaite

Context & Ripple Effects

This GigaOM conversation is the second time Cohen has mapped the company's road in public — he gave a similar forward-looking interview to Wired back in 2006, when the Hollywood download store was still the plan. By 2010 the storefront-for-studios ambition has given way to selling publishers efficient bit-moving infrastructure.

The repositioning also lands in a changed ecosystem: The Pirate Bay said in 2007 it saw a future without BitTorrent, while Brightcove had already wired a BitTorrent stream into its video platform the same year — evidence the protocol was being adopted as plumbing by commercial distributors even as its pirate associations persisted.

First-order effects

  • Publishers weighing large-file delivery now have Cohen himself making the cost case directly, with BitTorrent formally out of the retail-content business and competing as a distribution-technology vendor.
  • The retreat closes the door on the studio-download-store model, freeing BitTorrent's engineering effort for the publisher-distribution product line.

Second-order effects

  • Commercial content-delivery vendors face a cheaper peer-assisted alternative for bulky files, forcing them to defend pricing on bandwidth-heavy workloads where BitTorrent's architecture has its clearest advantage.
  • Rights holders' lingering piracy concerns shape which publishers sign on, pushing BitTorrent toward customers whose content is less licensing-sensitive.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, protocols born in consumer file-sharing migrate up the stack into enterprise infrastructure, with their legal exposure shrinking as the company sells transport rather than content — a template other P2P-era projects may follow.

The trend: Protocol-originated companies are pivoting from consumer media storefronts to business-to-business distribution infrastructure, trading retail ambitions for bandwidth economics.