/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Verizon prez: ‘Microsoft is not at the forefront of our mind’

Some juicy remarks today from Lowell McAdam, president and COO of Verizon Communications and CEO of Verizon Wireless, about Microsoft and its standing — or lack thereof — in the mobile business.

The Microsoft Blog Nick Eaton

Context & Ripple Effects

McAdam dismissing Microsoft is the latest entry in a long Verizon tradition of publicly ranking its partners and rivals: back in June 2007 the carrier's COO waved off Apple's phone as 'iWhatever', the CEO said there was no need for an iPhone killer, and in April 2009 McAdam himself jabbed at Sprint while teasing LTE iPhones. The remark lands at a moment when Microsoft's mobile standing is visibly under strain — a September 30 proxy filing showed Ballmer took only half his maximum bonus over the company's struggles in the mobile market.

First-order effects

  • Microsoft enters the critical holiday carrier-negotiation window with the largest US carrier's number two executive saying on the record that the company is an afterthought in Verizon's mobile plans.
  • The comment compounds pressure already visible inside Microsoft: Ballmer's halved bonus, disclosed days earlier in the SEC proxy, was explicitly tied to mobile-market struggles.

Second-order effects

  • Rival OS vendors competing for Verizon shelf space — the same platform bets McAdam's LTE-era strategy has been built around — gain leverage in placement and subsidy talks whenever the carrier signals who is and isn't 'at the forefront'.
  • Microsoft's counterpunch options narrow to proving demand elsewhere: its confirmed slate-tablet push against the iPad, timed for Christmas, and retail expansion like the Mall of America store opening directly across from an Apple store are the visible attempts to build pull that carriers can't ignore.

Third-order effects

  • If carriers keep acting as de facto kingmakers — anointing which OSes get premium placement — mobile platform competition shifts from consumer pull to carrier blessing, and vendors without it must buy relevance through retail, tablets, or ecosystem plays outside the handset aisle.
  • The episode fits the pattern analysts flagged in May's Whither Verizon? questioning: Verizon's scale lets it treat even the largest software companies as replaceable suppliers, a power asymmetry likely to shape how every OS vendor negotiates US distribution.

The trend: US carriers are consolidating their role as gatekeepers of the smartphone OS market, with public dismissals like this one functioning as negotiating leverage rather than offhand remarks.