/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

iPad is just the beginning

The media pad market is brand new.  And it's not going to be stuck at a 9.7-inch diagonal.  —  So, no one should be surprised by rumors about Apple bringing out more tablets (or tablet-like devices) beyond the current 9.7-inch iPad.

CNET News Brooke Crothers

Context & Ripple Effects

The tablet story has been building for over a year: Silicon Alley Insider flagged an Apple tablet arriving in 2010 back in May 2009, and by March 2010 Computerworld reported Arm expected more than 50 iPad-like devices this year from its licensees. The iPad shipped into exactly that crowded field.

This piece argues the obvious next move: with the media pad category brand new, no one should be surprised that Apple is rumored (emphasis on rumored) to be working on tablets beyond the current 9.7-inch diagonal — meaning the iPad is positioned as a line, not a single device.

First-order effects

  • Apple's rumored second and third tablet sizes would let it bracket the market itself rather than cede smaller or larger diagonals to the 50-plus ARM-based rivals already shipping in 2010.
  • Buyers choosing among the incoming wave of iPad-like devices would face Apple competing across form factors instead of only at 9.7 inches.

Second-order effects

  • The ARM licensees behind those 50-plus devices would be squeezed into differentiating on price and software rather than screen size, since Apple could occupy multiple diagonals of its own.
  • Display and component suppliers would see demand split across several tablet sizes per vendor, changing which panel specifications win volume orders.

Third-order effects

  • If Apple extends the iPad into a family of sizes, the 'media pad' settles into a distinct product category between phone and laptop, forcing every PC maker to decide whether tablets replace netbooks or cannibalize their own laptops.
  • A multi-size iPad line would also set up the competitive question rivals were already asking — what justifies buying anything else — as the category's structure hardened around Apple's pricing ladder.

The trend: The tablet market is moving from a single 9.7-inch reference design toward multi-size product lines, as Apple expands beyond the original iPad while dozens of ARM-licensee challengers arrive.