/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

The real reason why Steve Jobs hates Flash

There has been some ... interesting news from the tech sector this week.  —  Firstly, the Apple vs. Adobe vendetta gets even nastier, with a public letter from Steve Jobs explaining why Adobe's Flash multimedia format will not ever be allowed …

Charlie's Diary Charlie Stross

Context & Ripple Effects

The letter lands after months of friction that had already gone semi-public: Jobs dismissed Flash at his Wall Street Journal iPad demo in February, and commentators spent early 2010 debating whether Adobe should retire the format on its own terms rather than wait for platforms to drop it. The same week, discussion of HTML5 as a replacement for Flash in mobile apps was already circulating among investors.

What changes with 'Thoughts on Flash' is that an informal exclusion becomes declared policy: Jobs states outright that Flash will never be permitted on Apple's platforms, framing the rejection as a choice of open standards over what he argues is not the Web. An open reply to Jobs appeared the same day, marking the moment the disagreement turned into a named public feud rather than a private platform decision.

First-order effects

  • Adobe's mobile Flash strategy loses its largest prospective smartphone and tablet audience overnight, since Jobs' letter commits Apple to permanent exclusion rather than case-by-case app review decisions.

Second-order effects

  • Developers targeting iPhone OS must rebuild Flash-dependent content in HTML5 or native apps, shifting tooling and ad-serving spend toward formats Apple endorses, while Android's openness becomes Adobe's main counter-argument to market.

Third-order effects

  • If other platform owners follow Apple's lead, control over which web technologies ship on devices moves from standards bodies and plugin vendors to handset makers — making the format wars a distribution-power question rather than a technical one.

The trend: Platform owners are asserting veto power over third-party runtimes on mobile devices, with Apple's Flash ban as the defining test of whether open web standards displace proprietary plugins.