/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Can You Trust a Facebook Profile?

Do people display their actual or idealised personalities on social networking sites?  —  There are now over 700 million people around the world with profiles on social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace.  In the US 75% of those between 18 …

PsyBlog Jeremy Dean

Context & Ripple Effects

The authenticity question has been running since at least 2007, when the BBC asked whether online friends are for real and survey data showed 31% of social network users admitting they enter false information. A 2008 Washington Post piece then documented how flashy Facebook profiles come at a cost to privacy, framing profiles as performances rather than records.

This PsyBlog piece adds the psychological layer to that arc: with over 700 million people worldwide holding profiles on sites like Facebook and MySpace, it asks whether those profiles express users' actual or their idealised personalities. The answer matters commercially because Facebook's advertising model, its PayPal payments integration announced this week, and the 13% of US portal traffic Compete attributes to it all rest on profile data meaning something.

First-order effects

  • Anyone who screens a person through their profile — recruiters, admissions officers, dates, landlords — is reading either an actual or an aspirational self, and this research determines which; if idealisation dominates, profile-based judgment systematically misprices people.
  • Facebook and MySpace's pitch to advertisers depends on profile data tracking real traits; a body of evidence showing systematic idealisation would undercut the premise that profiles are reliable targeting signals.

Second-order effects

  • Identity verification moves from background concern to product requirement: the same week, a NetWitness report identified Facebook as the primary malware-distribution channel for a botnet army, so platforms face pressure to distinguish genuine from manufactured personas alongside merely embellished ones.
  • Facebook's own moderation calls become de facto authenticity rulings — the suspension and rapid restoration of three Argentines' profiles behind the satirical book 'Faceboom' after a Latin American media uproar shows the platform already arbitrating which self-presentations count as legitimate.

Third-order effects

  • If profiles become a primary identity layer for commerce and reputation, the industry splits between platforms profiting from optimistic self-presentation and verifiers selling ground truth — a structural tension between self-reported and authenticated identity.
  • Regulatory attention follows trust: once profile data drives credit, hiring, and payments decisions, the accuracy claims platforms make about user information stop being a psychology question and become a disclosure question.

The trend: Social networking profiles are hardening from casual self-expression into load-bearing identity records, forcing platforms, advertisers, and eventually regulators to decide how much curated self-presentation they will treat as fact.