/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Analyzing Facebook's Forthcoming Redesign

Last week, a source emailed us two screenshots of Facebook's forthcoming redesign.  While it's still a work in progress, it shows some simple yet major enhancements that reveal where the world's largest social network with over 350 million subscribers might be headed.

GigaOM Om Malik

Context & Ripple Effects

Facebook last overhauled its look in September 2006, when its facelift landed on a campus-focused network; three years on, the site GigaOM's source photographed in leaked screenshots serves more than 350 million members who collectively spend 10 billion minutes a day there. The shots are unconfirmed and described as a work in progress, so what they show is direction, not a shipped product.

The stakes are commercial as much as cosmetic: an eMarketer projection reported days before these leaks has Facebook overtaking MySpace in worldwide ad revenues in 2010 ($605 million versus $385 million), and separate unconfirmed chatter about proposed changes to unfriending was already drawing user criticism in late December.

First-order effects

  • More than 350 million users would confront a new interface overnight, putting the 10 billion minutes of daily engagement Facebook depends on directly at stake if the 'simple yet major enhancements' disrupt learned habits.
  • Facebook's own designers gain a test bed for whether the 2006-era layout still fits a network that has grown from campuses into a population rivaling the third-largest country.

Second-order effects

  • Advertisers weighing the projected $605 million 2010 spend get a refreshed canvas whose effectiveness against MySpace's $385 million becomes a live comparison point for where budgets flow.
  • Rival social networks face pressure to answer a redesigned leader rather than compete on features alone, since interface familiarity is part of what keeps mainstream users anchored.

Third-order effects

  • If the rhythm holds — a facelift in 2006, another major rework now — periodic wholesale redesigns become standing operating procedure for social platforms, each cycle testing how much change a mainstream user base will absorb before revolting.
  • A platform at this scale effectively sets interface conventions for the whole category, meaning Facebook's design decisions propagate into user expectations for every competitor's product.

The trend: Social networks are shifting from fixed layouts toward periodically redesigned product surfaces, with each overhaul doubling as a bet that mainstream users will trade habit disruption for a better advertising canvas.