/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Sponsorship-supported Crunchpad is alive.  ‘Steamrolling’ says Arrington.

I should have been in bed but I got hooked into an excellent Gilmore Gang videocast (below) this evening.  Robert Scoble, Mike Arrington, P Rangaswami, Kevin Marks, and Saul Hansell talk a lot about the iPhone and Driod war …

UMPCPortal Chippy

Context & Ripple Effects

UMPCPortal's report comes straight out of the Gilmore Gang videocast recorded the day before, where Scoble, Arrington, Rangaswami, Marks and Hansell spent much of their time on the iPhone-versus-Droid fight — and where Arrington volunteered that the sponsorship-supported Crunchpad is very much alive and 'steamrolling' ahead.

The claim matters because CrunchGear had already framed September 2009 as the start of a tablet war, and the Crunchpad is TechCrunch's own entrant: a blog-turned-media-company building consumer hardware underwritten by sponsors rather than sold at retail.

First-order effects

  • TechCrunch and Mike Arrington are publicly committing to shipping a hardware device whose economics depend on sponsorships, not unit sales — an unusual funding structure for consumer electronics.
  • The Crunchpad now positions itself directly against the iPhone/Droid device ecosystems that dominated the same videocast's discussion.

Second-order effects

  • If a media brand can field a tablet via sponsor backing, rival gadget blogs and media companies face pressure to treat hardware as an extension of their brand rather than something they only review.
  • Sponsors gain a new placement channel: pre-installed services and branding on a device aimed squarely at the tech-early-adopter audience TechCrunch already owns.

Third-order effects

  • The pattern points toward media companies becoming product companies — collapsing the line between publisher and OEM just as cheap tablet reference designs lower the barrier to entry.
  • A credible blogger-built tablet would also force incumbent tablet makers to compete for mind-share in channels they don't control: the feeds and podcasts of the people who cover them.

The trend: As the tablet category opens in late 2009, media brands are testing whether audience and sponsor money can substitute for traditional hardware economics.