/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Apple: Yes, It Makes Money On The App Store

There is widespread agreement that the Apple (AAPL) App Store has changed the face of the handset business, forcing other companies to scramble in a desperate attempt to keep up.  At last count, Apple said over 1.8 billion apps had been downloaded …

Tech Trader Daily Eric Savitz

Context & Ripple Effects

In May 2009, Lightspeed Venture Partners argued Apple had made no more than $20-45m from the App Store — pocket change against iPhone hardware margins. With this report, Apple pushes back directly: the store is a money-maker, not a loss-leader marketing expense, alongside confirmation that over 1.8 billion apps have been downloaded.

That framing matters because the store has already reshaped the handset market — Apple itself concedes rivals are scrambling to copy it — so whether the model pays its own way determines how hard competitors will chase it.

First-order effects

  • Apple now has public cover to keep investing in the App Store as a standalone business rather than an accessory to iPhone sales, while its handset rivals' scramble to build competing stores gains urgency because the incumbent claims the model is profitable.

Second-order effects

  • Rival handset makers and carriers building their own app storefronts will benchmark against Apple's take rate, turning app-store commissions into a visible pricing battleground rather than a hidden cost of selling phones.

Third-order effects

  • If every major phone platform converges on a commission-based app store, the take rate becomes the industry's contested economic choke point — the structure that later debates over regulating platform commissions would attach to.

The trend: Smartphone platforms are consolidating around commission-based app stores as profit centers in their own right, with Apple setting the template rivals feel compelled to replicate.