/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Windows Live lost $560m in FY09

Microsoft this morning gave Wall Street analysts new information about some recent behind-the-scenes reshuffling of its business groups.  In the process, the company provided details about the financial performance of groups whose results are normally hidden …

TechFlash Todd Bishop

Context & Ripple Effects

Microsoft's consumer-services numbers have long been buried inside broader segments, so the analyst briefing that surfaced them is itself the story: the company used a behind-the-scenes reshuffling of its business groups as the occasion to open books it normally keeps closed. The $560 million fiscal 2009 loss for Windows Live puts a hard figure on problems analysts had already been flagging — CNET reported as far back as January 2007 that poor Live branding was hurting Microsoft, suggesting the identity crisis predates the red ink.

The disclosure also lands against a longer reporting backdrop: Microsoft's quarterly results have historically been read through big-segment aggregates like the ones published in its fiscal 2006 Q1 release. Breaking out a single consumer division's losses changes what Wall Street can hold management accountable for.

First-order effects

  • Analysts covering Microsoft gain a standalone P&L for Windows Live for the first time, letting them benchmark its consumer web and services spend directly against rivals instead of inferring it from segment averages.
  • The executives running the newly reorganized groups now own visible numbers — a $560 million annual loss is no longer absorbable inside an opaque segment.

Second-order effects

  • Google and Yahoo, competing with Microsoft's free consumer offerings funded out of Windows profits, face a Redmond leadership under new investor scrutiny to either fix those economics or shrink the footprint.
  • Advertisers and partners evaluating Microsoft's web properties get a clearer signal about how much subsidy sits behind those products, sharpening their negotiating position.

Third-order effects

  • If Microsoft keeps disclosing formerly hidden division results, other conglomerate-style tech companies will face pressure to do the same, making unprofitable 'strategic' consumer services harder to shelter inside healthy core businesses.

The trend: Tech conglomerates are moving toward finer-grained financial disclosure, exposing money-losing consumer web divisions that were once cross-subsidized invisibly by core businesses like Windows and Office.