/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

In 8 Years, Online Video Consumption Will be Measured in Exabytes

One exabyte is a billion gigabytes.  It's one quintillion bytes.  And yes, “quintillion” is a number so large, it almost seems made-up.  But that's how much online video will be consumed by 2017, according to new reports from U.K.-based research firm Coda.

ReadWriteWeb Sarah Perez

Context & Ripple Effects

This forecast lands eight months after NewTeeVee measured a 40% single-year jump in time spent watching video — Coda's job here is converting that behavioral growth curve into a hard network number: one exabyte (a billion gigabytes) of annual online video consumption by 2017.

It matters because exabyte-scale figures stop being curiosities once research houses publish them: they become the shared planning vocabulary between video publishers, delivery networks, and the carriers footing the transit bill. Coda, a U.K.-based firm best known in this corpus for the forecast itself, is staking its research brand on quantifying that shift.

First-order effects

  • Online video publishers gain a quantified demand curve to plan against — Coda's 2017 target translates the 2008–09 surge in viewing hours into a concrete delivery volume that determines their bandwidth budgets.
  • Carriers and delivery-network operators receive a headline figure they can fold directly into capacity roadmaps, replacing ad-hoc estimates of video's share of traffic.

Second-order effects

  • As video dominates traffic mixes, the gap widens between flat-rate consumer access pricing and per-gigabit delivery costs, forcing CDN and transit providers toward video-weighted contracts.
  • Ad-supported video services face a structural squeeze: revenue scales with views while delivery cost scales with bytes, making compression and encoding efficiency a competitive lever.

Third-order effects

  • If forecasts at this scale hold, traffic volume displaces user counts and session metrics as the industry's primary unit of planning — and the methodology behind exabyte projections becomes something research firms must defend publicly.
  • Sustained exabyte-scale demand pushes infrastructure economics toward purpose-built video delivery layers rather than general-purpose web infrastructure.

The trend: Internet-scale forecasting is upgrading its units from gigabytes to exabytes as video becomes the dominant payload of consumer broadband.