/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Google to Acquire On2 Technologies

CLIFTON PARK, NY and MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. (August 5, 2009) - On2 Technologies, Inc. (NYSE Amex: ONT) and Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) jointly announced today that they have entered into a definitive agreement under which Google will acquire On2, a leading developer of video compression technology.

Google

Context & Ripple Effects

Google's acquisition record runs through infrastructure and enterprise capability: the stake taken in AOL in December 2005 and the purchase of Postini in July 2007 were both about owning layers of the stack rather than consumer products. On2 continues that pattern at a small-ticket scale — TechCrunch pegs the deal at $106 million for a NYSE Amex-listed codec developer.

First-order effects

  • Google takes control of On2's compression portfolio and its licensing business, meaning existing licensees — most prominently Adobe, whose Flash carries On2 codecs per NewTeeVee's 'Watch Out, Flash' framing — now have their video-format roadmap set by a direct competitor.
  • The deal removes ONT as an independent public company, folding a specialist codec vendor into a buyer that does not need it to turn a profit.

Second-order effects

  • With Chrome OS unveiled two days earlier and the 'Going Google' campaign aimed at Microsoft, in-house compression gives Google's browser-and-OS push a native answer to Flash's media layer, forcing Adobe to defend the plugin's remaining monopoly on web video delivery.
  • Rival codec licensors face a new dynamic: a platform giant that can absorb the technology outright and distribute it cheaply at YouTube scale, compressing the licensing economics the incumbents charge for.

Third-order effects

  • If platform owners keep buying the video stack piece by piece, codec selection stops being a standards-body decision and becomes a balance-sheet weapon, with openly licensed formats as the wedge against paid ones.
  • The $106 million price point is a data point in itself: foundational media infrastructure can change hands cheaply when the buyer values it strategically, making small-cap companies with core IP natural targets for the largest internet firms.

The trend: Web video is moving toward platform-owned compression, as large internet companies buy codec developers outright instead of licensing formats from independent vendors.