/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

What's Holding Back Google Apps?

The search giant aims to compete in business software with Google Apps.  But some clients fret over storing data on its servers—and its rivals are big  —  When Google (GOOG) announced a foray into business software two years ago, it touted General Electric (GE) as one of its trophy accounts.

Business Week Aaron Ricadela

Context & Ripple Effects

Two years into its push into business software, Google still leans on marquee names — General Electric among them — to sell Google Apps, but Business Week's reporting finds confirmed client unease over storing corporate data on Google's servers. That trust gap echoes an earlier verdict: a 2007 InfoWorld assessment found Google Apps no match for Microsoft Office, and Google has been fighting on two fronts since, having also launched business search that year as part of a broader wave that included Apple taking aim at Office.

First-order effects

  • Corporate buyers considering Google Apps must resolve a data-custody question before any feature comparison matters — confirmed client concerns about information living on Google's servers stall deals regardless of price.
  • Google carries the burden of proof against a rival whose suite is already installed everywhere; every enterprise pitch starts by explaining why Office should be displaced, not whether Apps works.

Second-order effects

  • Microsoft's cheapest competitive response is to amplify the trust argument rather than match Apps on price — defending the installed base by framing local storage as a control advantage.
  • To convert skeptics, Google must invest in enterprise-grade assurance around its hosting, raising its cost per seat and stretching the timeline on which Apps can show real revenue traction.

Third-order effects

  • If the custody concern persists, enterprise software bifurcates: lightweight collaboration drifts toward hosted services while regulated or sensitive workloads stay in licensed desktop suites — forcing SaaS vendors to build certification and control features as table stakes rather than differentiators.

The trend: Enterprise software is migrating from licensed desktop suites toward hosted services, with customer trust in third-party data storage setting the pace of adoption.