/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Pocket Meeting: A $5 WebEx Killer?

Sharing your screen with someone while chatting on the phone is one of those things that's much harder than it ought to be.  We've tried a lot of different tools and none of them makes us very happy.  The newest entrant into this field is Pocket Meeting and it's got some promise.

ReadWriteWeb Marshall Kirkpatrick

Context & Ripple Effects

Cisco's WebEx spent early 2009 pushing onto new surfaces — GigaOM covered WebEx arriving on the iPhone in January — while its core desktop product still carried enterprise-grade pricing. Pocket Meeting's launch attacks that gap directly: a confirmed relationship frames it as a low-cost challenger positioned squarely against WebEx.

The pitch is narrow and deliberate — a $5 tool whose confirmed use case is screen sharing during an ordinary phone call, the pairing ReadWriteWeb says existing tools all handle badly. It matters because it treats screen sharing as a cheap utility rather than a seat-licensed suite feature.

First-order effects

  • Pocket Meeting gives small teams and solo callers a $5 alternative to WebEx for ad-hoc screen sharing over a phone call, undercutting Cisco on price for the simplest meeting scenario.
  • WebEx's 'killer' label puts immediate pricing pressure on Cisco's entry-level tiers: a challenger charging single-digit dollars makes per-seat enterprise pricing visible by contrast.

Second-order effects

  • Incumbent conferencing vendors face a bundling dilemma — match the $5 standalone price and cannibalize suite revenue, or cede the casual-meeting segment to micro-priced entrants.
  • A wave of lookalike low-cost screen-sharing tools becomes likely, since the underlying capability requires little proprietary technology and the pain point ReadWriteWeb documents is widely shared.

Third-order effects

  • If micro-priced tools keep peeling off single functions from conferencing suites, screen sharing drifts from being a product category toward being a commodity feature embedded in phones, browsers, and chat clients — squeezing vendors whose business model assumes per-seat licensing.
  • The 'X killer' framing around a $5 entrant signals how conferencing competition shifts from feature parity battles between suites to price-point disruption at the edges of the market.

The trend: Conferencing is fragmenting from expensive all-in-one suites toward cheap, single-purpose tools that strip out one workflow — screen sharing during a call — and sell it at consumer prices.