/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

The Next Target For Google: Corporate IT Budgets

There's an old debate in the Valley about whether Google (GOOG) is really a media company or a technology company.  In a sense, it is a silly debate, which is mostly a matter of semantics.  A better question is this …

Tech Trader Daily Eric Savitz

Context & Ripple Effects

This piece arrives in the middle of a stretch where Google keeps widening what kind of company it is. The acquisition-and-funding question dates back years — what Google might buy next and its friction with venture capitalists in late 2005 — and by September 2007 it had formalized a venture-investing role of its own. In May 2008 it confirmed plans to put display ads on Google.com itself, stretching the ad business past search links.

March 2009 alone adds three moves in the same direction: the GrandCentral property relaunched as Google Voice on March 12 with a stated ambition to be the world's communication hub — explicitly putting it against Skype, Microsoft and mobile operators — followed by the Undo Send experiment in Gmail Labs on March 19. Against that backdrop, aiming at corporate IT budgets reads less like a new strategy than the next application of an existing one.

First-order effects

  • Google's hosted apps now compete for line items inside CIO budgets at the worst moment for incumbents — the 2009 downturn gives cost-focused IT buyers a reason to trial cheap, browser-delivered alternatives to Microsoft's Exchange and Office franchises.
  • The old 'media company or technology company' debate gets resolved by arithmetic rather than semantics: enterprise subscriptions would give Google a revenue base that is neither advertising nor licensing.

Second-order effects

  • Microsoft is forced to defend per-seat desktop licensing against a rival that can bundle mail, documents and now voice (via Google Voice) at near-zero marginal cost, pressuring the pricing of its most profitable product lines.
  • Skype and mobile operators gain a competitor whose distribution runs through Gmail and the Android platform rather than through paid subscriber acquisition.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, workplace software migrates from installed licenses sold to procurement departments toward hosted services subsidized by one company's advertising cash flow — concentrating the enterprise collaboration market around whoever owns the data center and the inbox.
  • A Google that sells into corporate IT stops being categorizable as either media or technology firm, forcing analysts and regulators to evaluate it on multiple fronts simultaneously.

The trend: Consumer-scale web companies are converting free hosted products into enterprise revenue, attacking the license-based software incumbents from below.