/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

What Convergence?  TV's Hesitant March to the Net

PALO ALTO, Calif. — You would be hard-pressed to find a screen today that does not have Internet access.  It's not just the PC and the phone — online content appears in elevators, in the back of taxis and at your airplane seat.

New York Times Matt Richtel

Context & Ripple Effects

By early 2009 the industry had spent years predicting a merger of television and the web — coverage stretching back to CNET's 2005 look at the Internet's future for TV and the Journal's late-2007 piece on the same collision. Yet while connectivity spread everywhere else, TV makers remained cautious about putting the Internet inside the set itself. This piece captures that hesitation at a hinge moment: months later, hybrid Internet-TV efforts were showing real traction in Europe (hybrid broadcast-web models making progress), suggesting the lag was strategic rather than technical.

First-order effects

  • TV manufacturers face immediate pressure to decide whether to ship connected sets now or cede the living-room screen to external boxes and PCs, since online video is already reaching every other kind of display.
  • Content owners gain a new distribution surface — screens in taxis, elevators, and planes — but must format and license programming for these fragmented out-of-home contexts before the TV itself comes online.

Second-order effects

  • Set-top boxes, game consoles, and PC-to-TV bridges become the interim winners: if televisions stay 'dumb,' intermediaries capture the connected-TV relationship and the viewer data that comes with it.
  • Broadcasters and cable operators watch their gatekeeper position erode as web delivery matures — the European hybrid-TV progress later in 2009 shows networks adapting by blending broadcast with IP rather than resisting it.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, the TV's value shifts from the hardware and the channel lineup to software and services — whoever controls the interface and the app platform on the screen, not the tuner, owns the customer.
  • The eventual outcome is likely an open question between walled-garden TV platforms and open web delivery; which wins will shape regulation of content access and whether pay-TV bundles survive in an unbundled world.

The trend: This is one data point in the slow, contested migration of television from a closed broadcast appliance to a networked software platform.