/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

It's Time For An Apple Tablet: Where's My iPod Touch HD?  (AAPL)

Apple's (AAPL) iPod touch is a hit, and PC makers like Dell (DELL) and Asus are doing good business selling cheap, small “netbook” laptops.  It's time for Steve Jobs to smash them together into a killer multi-touch tablet.

Silicon Alley Insider Dan Frommer

Context & Ripple Effects

At the end of 2008, Apple's iPod touch is selling well while Dell and Asus profit from cheap, small netbook laptops — two product lines that this analysis argues are one device waiting to be merged. The piece is a direct call for Steve Jobs to build a multi-touch tablet that would neutralize the netbook threat from within.

The call proved prescient in the coverage arc that followed: an Apple patent surfacing a possible tablet design in early 2009, then reports of an Apple tablet arriving in 2010 and a $1.2 billion tablet computer project later that year — the run-up to what became the iPad.

First-order effects

  • Apple faces immediate strategic pressure to answer the netbook wave from Dell and Asus with its own large-screen touch device rather than cede the cheap-portable segment.
  • If built as an 'iPod Touch HD,' the device would extend the App Store/iOS economics beyond the phone-sized screen, giving developers a new canvas on day one.

Second-order effects

  • Netbook makers like Asus and Dell would be forced to reposition — competing against a premium Apple tablet that undercuts the netbook's value proposition rather than just another Windows laptop vendor.
  • Component suppliers and carriers would recalibrate around a new mid-size touch category sitting between the smartphone and the laptop.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, tablets become a distinct third computing category, and rivals' tablet attempts get judged almost entirely by app ecosystems — as later coverage asking 'why buy this instead of an iPad?' and HP's TouchPad's app shortfall illustrate.
  • Success would cement the model of Apple defining categories and competitors defining themselves reactively against it, shifting industry innovation from spec sheets to software platforms.

The trend: This is an early data point in the shift from spec-driven portable PCs toward touch-first, app-ecosystem-defined computing devices — the category creation that culminated in the iPad era.