/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

MySpace versus Facebook: Analysis of both traffic and ad revenue, using Google Trends

(above, Facebook beating MySpace in Australia with the crossover at Oct 07)  —  MySpace versus Facebook  —  As some of you know, I've previously written about the MySpace versus Facebook topic, both a year ago in the post Wanna bet?

Futuristic Play Andrew Chen

Context & Ripple Effects

By mid-2008 the MySpace-versus-Facebook race had become a running argument measured in dueling metrics. Traffic trackers still showed MySpace ahead — one January 2008 ReadWriteWeb piece insisted MySpace was 'still kicking Facebook's ass' — while page-view data told a different story, with Facebook climbing to third and MySpace down nearly 20% by late 2007. This analysis adds a third lens: Google Trends search interest, which already showed Facebook crossing over MySpace in Australia around October 2007, consistent with reporting that MySpace had slipped to middle-of-the-road as Facebook surged. The ad-revenue question remained open, with MySpace's targeting advantage seen as its key defense.

First-order effects

  • The analysis reframes the rivalry from a traffic fight into a leading-indicator question: search-interest crossovers (like Australia's October 2007 flip) suggest Facebook's momentum is broadening market-by-market even where MySpace retains raw traffic leadership.
  • MySpace's remaining advantage narrows to monetization — its ad-targeting capabilities were viewed as what Facebook would eventually match, making ad revenue the next battleground after audience.

Second-order effects

  • If search trends lead traffic and traffic leads revenue, advertisers and media buyers face pressure to shift budgets toward Facebook before the official numbers confirm the crossover — accelerating the very decline being projected.
  • Competing measurement sources (Google Trends, Compete, ad projections) force the industry to argue about methodology rather than facts, since each dataset tells a different story about who is winning.

Third-order effects

  • The pattern points toward social network dominance being decided by engagement quality and advertiser tooling rather than raw registered users — a template later confirmed when projections showed Facebook's ad revenue overtaking MySpace's.
  • It foreshadows the winner-take-most structure of social advertising, where a single platform consolidates the bulk of ad spend once perceived momentum tips.

The trend: This is an early data point in the consolidation of social networking into a single dominant ad platform, where momentum indicators — not incumbent scale — predict which network captures the market's advertising value.