/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Bullish About the Web

ONLINE ADS: WINNERS AND LOSERS  —  Perhaps because a Jan. 2 report (pdf) by JPMorgan Chase on Internet stocks ran 312 pages, it took a while for many bloggers to digest it.  “Nothing but Net,” written by Imran Khan, a stock analyst, and his team at the investment bank …

New York Times Dan Mitchell

Context & Ripple Effects

The Times piece is a second pass at Imran Khan's 312-page JPMorgan report "Nothing but Net," first picked up by TechCrunch in its January 2 write-up of JPMorgan's 2008 Internet outlook and only now fully digested by the blogging layer. That lag matters: a document that size functions less as a note than as a year-long reference frame for how the Street prices web stocks.

It also lands mid-arc on a running argument about whether the Web 2.0 buildout is overfunded. Kedrosky's late-2006 Web 2.0 short-sellers' list put the bear case on record, while the May 2007 Betting on the Future analysis weighed where durable value sits; a 312-page bull case from a major bank is the heaviest institutional counterweight that debate has produced.

First-order effects

  • Investors tracking online advertising get a single consolidated framework from JPMorgan naming winners and losers across the ad market, replacing scattered sector notes with one house view.
  • Imran Khan's team becomes the most-cited voice on Internet stocks going into 2008, since the report's length makes it the default citation for anyone arguing the bull or bear side.

Second-order effects

  • Rival banks' internet analysts are pushed to respond with their own full-year outlooks rather than piecemeal calls, because a 312-page anchor resets what clients expect from coverage.
  • Bloggers and financial media now have a shared scorecard to measure quarterly ad results against, which concentrates attention on whichever names Khan's team flagged as losers.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, sell-side mega-reports become the mechanism through which Wall Street opinion consolidates around web advertising as the sector's core economic engine, crowding out earlier valuation debates about traffic or technology alone.
  • A widely distributed bull consensus built before any downturn would sharpen the repricing if ad growth disappoints, since the same institutions would be forced to unwind a published position.

The trend: Annual sell-side mega-reports like "Nothing but Net" are turning Wall Street research into the central scoreboard for how online advertising and web stocks are priced.