/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Sophomoric Pranks Do Not a Journalist Make

Last week gadget blog Gizmodo admitted to pulling a prank at CES 2008 in which they used a device to turn off TVs on the exhibit floor and during company presentations.  In their post about the prank Gizmodo apologized ("It was too much fun …

ReadWriteWeb Josh Catone

Context & Ripple Effects

The arc runs fast: Gizmodo confessed to killing TVs across the CES show floor with TV-B-Gone clickers on January 10, the CEA answered within a day by stripping its credentials, and by January 13 exhibitors were being told to disable the IR ports on demo Macs. ReadWriteWeb's piece is the judgment layer on that sequence — an argument that the apology and the 'banned for life' bravado do not add up to journalism.

The story travelled unusually wide for a trade-show stunt: Scobleizer praised Brian Lam's turnaround, Webware picked at who gets called holier-than-thou, and Gizmodo itself reframed the ban as civil disobedience. That spread matters because it turned one blog's prank into a referendum on whether traffic-chasing stunts are compatible with press credentials.

First-order effects

  • Gizmodo works CES 2008 without floor access after the CEA's ban, trading exhibit-hall scooping for the audience that comes with the martyrdom framing of its 'banned for life' post.
  • Exhibitors change behavior immediately: the Macworld advice to disable IR ports shows vendors treating every demo display as vulnerable to a $20 consumer clicker.

Second-order effects

  • Rival gadget blogs face a forced positioning choice — condemn the prank to protect their own credential relationships, or match the stunt traffic — with editors like Scoble publicly rewarding the apology as reputation management.
  • TV-B-Gone-style devices get free marketing from the coverage, pushing show organizers toward RF/IR hygiene rules and hardened demo setups as a standard cost of exhibiting.

Third-order effects

  • Trade-show press credentialing becomes an enforcement tool against blogs rather than just an access pass, drawing a line between accredited outlets and stunt-driven ones as the blog era professionalizes.
  • If prank-as-coverage keeps paying in traffic, the industry drifts toward a split press corps — credentialed reviewers versus provocateurs — with ethics debates recurring at every major event.

The trend: Consumer-electronics blogging is colliding with traditional press-access norms, and trade bodies like the CEA are using credential bans to decide where stunts stop counting as journalism.