/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

8 Reasons Why The TV Studios Will Die

Recently, I have met with many people including top executives from most of the largest studios as well as people from some of the top internet companies that are building studios, top investors in the VC world that are turning towards the studio business …

Dembot

Context & Ripple Effects

Writing in December 2007, Dembot grounds its argument in first-hand meetings rather than abstraction: conversations with top executives at most of the largest studios, with internet companies that are building their own studio operations, and with venture investors now directing money toward the studio business. Those last two points are the load-bearing ones — new production capacity and new capital are arriving simultaneously, from outside the traditional system.

The piece stands alone in this corpus — no syndicated pickup and no recorded public reaction — which makes it an early, unamplified entry in what was then an open argument about whether the majors' gatekeeping role survives the internet. The prediction that studios will die remains unconfirmed; what is confirmed in the reporting is the influx of rivals and funding.

First-order effects

  • Internet companies building in-house studios become direct competitors to the major studios for content and talent, contesting the studios' role as the necessary intermediary between creators and audiences.
  • Venture investors turning toward the studio business give would-be rivals committed capital to finance original production without studio financing.

Second-order effects

  • Studios still hold premium libraries and established distribution relationships, so the rational counter-move is tightening exclusivity around that content while the newcomers build production from scratch.
  • Competition for programming from funded internet entrants strengthens the bargaining position of creators and rights-holders against the incumbent studios.

Third-order effects

  • If internet-funded production keeps scaling, the studio's historic function — financing and distributing scarce video content — risks commoditizing, shifting industry power toward whoever owns the direct audience relationship online.
  • Whether the majors respond by becoming digital distributors themselves, rather than defending old channels, is the open variable that decides between industry consolidation and fragmentation.

The trend: Video production is migrating from centralized studios toward internet platforms backed by venture capital, with ownership of the audience relationship displacing control of distribution as the industry's core asset.