/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Can Blogs Do Journalism?

On the face of it, the question of whether blogs can do journalism is absurd — like asking whether sites published on Vignette can do journalism.  A blog, after all, is just a content management system — revolutionary because it made web-native publishing free …

Publishing 2.0 Scott Karp

Context & Ripple Effects

This piece lands at the end of a year spent litigating blogs' legitimacy. In March 2007 the Online Journalism Review asked whether blogs were a 'parasitic' medium living off mainstream reporting; by September, BuzzMachine was diagnosing what was wrong with newspapers' own blog efforts; and two weeks before this post, gapingvoid pushed back on the 'blogging is dead' obituary.

Publishing 2.0's move is to dissolve the question rather than answer it: a blog is just a content management system that made web-native publishing free, so asking whether blogs can do journalism is like asking whether sites built on Vignette can. That framing echoes the identity argument from early 2006 — Slate's 'not just another column about blogging' and AdAge's 'a blogger is just a writer with a cooler name' — and its pickup by the New York Times shows the debate had reached beyond the blogosphere into legacy print.

First-order effects

  • The argument hands professional bloggers like Gawker a ready rebuttal to 'parasite' charges: if the CMS is neutral, the criticism has to attach to reporting practices, not the publishing format.
  • Newspapers running blogs can no longer treat the format itself as the quality problem — their own weak blog efforts become an editing-and-resourcing question instead.

Second-order effects

  • Mainstream outlets weighing blog strategies face pressure to compete on process — sourcing, editing, accountability — rather than dismissing the format, since the tooling barrier to entry is now zero.
  • The 'parasitic medium' framing loses traction as the debate shifts to who does original work, forcing critics of blogs to name specific failures rather than blame the platform.

Third-order effects

  • If the tool-versus-practice distinction holds, the durable line in media stops being blog versus newspaper and becomes who performs verification and editing — a structural split between platforms and practices that outlasts any single publishing technology.

The trend: Web publishing debates are shifting from judging formats (blog versus newspaper) to judging practices (reporting, editing, sourcing) as content management tools commoditize distribution.