/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

I.B.M. to Push 'Cloud Computing,' Using Data From Afar

I.B.M. plans to build a sizable business by bringing Google-style computing to mainstream corporate customers.  —  The I.B.M. strategy, to be announced today, seeks to exploit the technical work and commercial interest in large data centers …

New York Times Steve Lohr

Context & Ripple Effects

I.B.M.'s commercial push is the payoff to the October research alliance with Google that put 'cloud computing' on the corporate agenda: what began as a joint university-and-research experiment in running web-scale workloads across large data centers is now being packaged as a product line for mainstream business customers. The same day, TechCrunch framed the effort under the Blue Cloud name, arguing it amounts to web-style computing rebranded for the enterprise.

First-order effects

  • Mainstream corporate customers gain a sanctioned path to rent Google-style data center computing from an incumbent vendor rather than building web-scale infrastructure themselves.
  • I.B.M. opens a new revenue line layered on its existing hardware and services franchise, betting that corporate demand will justify a sizable business built around remote data centers.

Second-order effects

  • Rival enterprise vendors face pressure to answer with their own utility-computing offerings, since I.B.M. attaching its brand to the model legitimizes renting compute over buying servers.
  • Pricing conversations in enterprise IT shift toward pay-per-use models, forcing resellers and systems integrators to reprice services that were previously sold as installed hardware projects.

Third-order effects

  • If corporate adoption follows the pattern the October alliance signaled, enterprise computing structurally moves from owned on-site machines toward networked data centers operated by a few large vendors — raising early questions about lock-in and who sets the standards for inter-cloud portability.

The trend: Enterprise computing is beginning its shift from company-owned servers to rented capacity in giant shared data centers, with legacy vendors racing to define the category before web-native players do.