/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Apps Already Coming for Google's New OpenSocial

A day after MySpace and Google sent shockwaves through the Web 2.0 world, third-party developers already are announcing plans to build applications using their jointly developed social network APIs.  —  Recommend this story?

PC World Heather Havenstein

Context & Ripple Effects

The launch details dropped October 30 and moved fast: Marc Andreessen framed OpenSocial as 'a new universe of social applications all over the web' the next day, and by November 1 TechCrunch was calling the MySpace, Bebo and SixApart defection to Google's standard 'checkmate' — the three biggest non-Facebook networks signing onto one set of social APIs. A November 2 analysis argued the real story is what OpenSocial means rather than what it ships.

What changed on November 3 is speed: developers are committing applications before most users have seen a single one, and the pickup was immediate enough that TechCrunch's syndicated follow-up reported the first OpenSocial application was hacked within 45 minutes of going live. The counterweight in the confirmed record: only sites invited to Google's launch event can currently host OpenSocial apps, and at least one prominent blogger is publicly criticizing the spec's missing Container API.

First-order effects

  • Third-party developers gain a write-once target: an application built against OpenSocial's jointly developed Google-MySpace APIs can reach audiences across MySpace, Bebo and SixApart without per-network ports, and several are announcing builds a single day after launch.
  • Google controls the gate for now — hosting is limited to sites invited to its launch event — so early developer commitments concentrate attention and traffic on whichever containers Google admits first.

Second-order effects

  • Facebook, which kept its application platform proprietary while MySpace, Bebo and SixApart joined the open standard, now faces pressure to respond either by opening its own APIs or by out-investing rivals in developer tools — the checkmate framing in coverage makes that contest explicit.
  • The 45-minute hack reported in syndicated coverage plus the public criticism of OpenSocial's missing Container API force Google into a rapid spec-iteration cycle, since security holes and API gaps in a shared standard propagate across every member network at once.

Third-order effects

  • If the standard holds, social application distribution shifts from per-network platform lock-in toward shared web-wide APIs, with Google positioned as the standard-setter across social networking — the same open-source coalition play it is running in mobile, where Android is confirmed as carrier- and handset-backed software aimed squarely at Apple's closed iPhone model.
  • Network operators become commodity hosts: when any container can run the same social apps, competition moves to audience size and data portability rather than exclusive developer deals, a structural change the invited-only launch phase is currently masking.

The trend: Web 2.0 platforms are consolidating around shared open API standards — first in social networking with OpenSocial, simultaneously in mobile with Android — as Google converts openness into standard-setting leverage against closed rivals like Apple and Facebook.