/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

A Few Important Concerns From the Facebook App O'Reilly Report

This past weekend Tim O'Reilly released a report that showed a curve in the number of users of Facebook apps.  Today, Erick brought Tim's post back with his own discussion about the chart and included a full top 200 Facebook apps in terms of active users.

CenterNetworks Allen Stern

Context & Ripple Effects

Three days after Tim O'Reilly published his long-tail analysis of the Facebook application market on O'Reilly Radar, Erick has revived the chart with his own commentary and a full ranking of the top 200 Facebook apps by active users. The pickup by TechCrunch and Download Squad shows how quickly the finding traveled: the June app feeding frenzy that followed the platform's opening has produced a usage curve ruled by the few.

The timing matters because Facebook is simultaneously tightening its own filters — the fbFund grant program announced by Mark Zuckerberg at TechCrunch40 is requiring all applications to be resubmitted — while rolling out self-serve Flyers ads and being described in the same discussion as potentially the biggest and most valuable database in the world.

First-order effects

  • Developers outside the top-ranked apps now have hard data showing their install base is thinning relative to the leaders, raising the bar for what counts as traction when fbFund applications are resubmitted.
  • Facebook gains a public benchmark of its platform's health just as it courts developers with fbFund grants and monetizes attention through member-created Flyers display ads.

Second-order effects

  • App makers competing for scarce top-200 slots will lean harder on viral mechanics and paid promotion, shifting spending toward whatever distribution channels Facebook controls or sells.
  • Investors and grant-makers like fbFund can use the concentration curve to triage the field, concentrating capital on the few apps with demonstrated active-user momentum rather than spreading it across the tail.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds across social platforms, application ecosystems will consolidate around a handful of winners per category, making the platform operator — here Facebook — the gatekeeper that decides which apps reach users and on what terms.
  • A market where one company holds both the user graph and the ad inventory points toward structural dependence: developers building on Facebook accept that the same company sets distribution rules, grant criteria, and advertising pricing.

The trend: Social-network application markets are settling into power-law concentration, with a few apps capturing most active users while the platform owner tightens control over distribution and monetization.