/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

The 10 rules of Twitter (and how I break every one)

If you follow the talk over on Twitter you'll see that there are some unwritten "rules" and that I am breaking lots of those rules and pissing lots of people off.  —  I break the rules so you don't have to.  —  So, what are they?

Scobleizer Robert Scoble

Context & Ripple Effects

By late September 2007, Twitter had spent the summer pushing past its early-adopter base: an integration with the MTV Video Music Awards aimed at mainstream viewers, new Profile Search for finding people to follow, email address-book import, and phone-in tweets via Dave Winer's TwitterGram. Growth was outpacing any shared sense of how the service was supposed to be used.

Into that gap steps Robert Scoble, who says he is deliberately breaking the community's unwritten rules and angering other users in the process — then publishes the list itself. With no official rulebook to appeal to, enforcement of Twitter etiquette at this point is entirely peer-to-peer, which is exactly why one prominent user's transgressions become a public argument rather than a moderation case.

First-order effects

  • Fellow Twitter users police Scoble's rule-breaking directly, confirming that in 2007 the platform's only working governance mechanism is social pressure among members.
  • Publishing the ten rules converts scattered gripes into an explicit debate over what the norms actually are — and hands newer users a visible map of conventions they never agreed to.

Second-order effects

  • As Twitter courts mainstream audiences through moves like the MTV partnership and lowers the barrier to following people via Profile Search, collisions between early-adopter etiquette and newcomer behavior multiply, forcing the company to choose between leaving norms informal and writing them down.
  • Rival services watching the fight — Pownce among them, already criticized by commentators for a weaker API — see that usability norms, not just features, shape which network users settle into.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, unwritten etiquette on fast-growing consumer platforms tends to harden into official policy once the user base diversifies enough that peer enforcement breaks down; the open question for Twitter is whether it codifies the rules itself or leaves the job to convention and third-party tooling.

The trend: As microblogging scales from early adopters to mainstream audiences, socially enforced etiquette becomes the raw material from which platforms eventually write formal rules.